Businesses shouldn't neglect compliance with Canada's privacy law. Over the last 20+ years, PIPEDA has been regularly and actively enforced.
With the recent proliferation of data privacy laws around the globe, Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA) often gets overlooked. This is perhaps partly due to the fact that PIPEDA is not a new law; it has been on the books and regularly enforced for over 20 years.
As is the case with many other privacy laws, PIPEDA can apply to organizations around the world, meaning it should at least be on the radar of businesses that process the personal information of Canadian residents.
Here is a brief introduction to PIPEDA and what it takes to comply with Canada’s privacy law.
PIPEDA was passed into law in 2000, largely to bring Canada in line with Europe’s Data Protection Directive (the predecessor to the GDPR). It is a wide-ranging law that is well summed-up by its 10 “Fair Information Principles”:
PIPEDA applies generally to any organization processing the personal information of Canadian individuals “in the course of commercial activities.”
That last part means that mostly only applies to for-profit businesses. However, it’s important to note that PIPEDA can apply to nonprofits if some of their activities are of a commercial character. The law specifically calls out the “selling, bartering or leasing of donor, membership, or other fundraising lists” as being commercial activity.
Can PIPEDA apply to foreign businesses? Yes, though the business must have what the Office of the Privacy Commissioner (OPC) calls a “real and substantial connection to Canada.” While this is a somewhat squishy standard, so too is the extraterritorial scope of the GDPR; the analysis for the applicability of the two laws is likely similar.
For example, if an eCommerce business is based in the United States, it should be considering issues such as: Does it have a significant number of customers in Canada? Does it display prices in Canadian dollars? Does it specifically make customers aware that it offers shipping to Canada? In the end, there is no black-and-white answer, and businesses (or regulators) must make a judgment call.
As with other data privacy laws, a core requirement of PIPEDA compliance is the posting of a privacy notice. This falls under the “Openness” principle, and is meant to give individuals concrete details about how a business is handling their personal information.
Required information includes:
Fulfilling these requirements will depend on having an accurate understanding of how your business collects, uses, and discloses personal information.
Consent plays a major role in the PIPEDA framework; all collection, use, and disclosure of personal information requires the individual’s consent. This is a significant departure from other privacy laws.
However, consent under PIPEDA is very different from privacy laws such as the GDPR or California Consumer Privacy Act. When those other laws mention consent, they mean express consent—i.e., the person must take some affirmative step such as checking a box or clicking “I accept” to indicate their consent. This is also called “opt-in consent.”
Under PIPEDA, consent may be either express or implied.
What is implied consent? When the consumer has been informed of the organization’s data practices, typically through the privacy policy or other timely notice, their continued use of the organization’s services is interpreted to mean that they have impliedly consented to those practices. Another term for this is “opt-out consent.” Under most circumstances, implied consent is considered valid under PIPEDA.
There are some circumstances, however, in which consent must be expressly given. According to the OPC, express consent is required when:
The OPC has also stated specifically that businesses may process personal information for behavioral advertising on an opt-out basis, provided a few conditions are met:
PIPEDA typically does not apply to personal information collected and used in an employment context. There is an exception to this rule for organizations classified as a “federal work, undertaking, or business.” These are organizations operating in federally regulated industries such as air travel, radio broadcast, and banking.
Determining the privacy rights of individuals under PIPEDA can be a little tricky. While the text of the statute does clearly lay out some rights, the OPC has also interpreted the law in a way that implies the existence of other rights, especially in relation to the right to withdraw consent.
Here’s a rundown on PIPEDA privacy rights:
In general, organizations should respond to privacy requests within 30 days. This period may be extended by a further 30 days if necessary and if the individual is notified before the original 30 days have passed. Opt-outs, on the other hand, should be processed immediately or soon as possible.
PIPEDA is primarily enforced by the Office of the Privacy Commissioner, albeit in its role as an ombudsman. That means the OPC is tasked with investigating privacy complaints and attempting to resolve violations, but it does not have the authority to issue orders, levy fines, or take organizations to court.
For example, if an individual files a complaint with the OPC, the OPC will investigate the complaint and produce a report on its findings. (It may also attempt to mediate a resolution.) The complaining individual can then take this report to a federal court and pursue their own legal remedy against the organization. In this sense, PIPEDA does have a private right of action.
In some situations, the OPC may also refer the case to a federal or provincial prosecutor’s office, which could result in large fines.
Disclaimer: This content is provided for general informational purposes only and does not constitute legal or other professional advice. Without limiting the foregoing, the content may not reflect recent developments in the law, may not be complete, and may not be accurate or relevant in an applicable jurisdiction. This content is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified licensed attorney in the applicable jurisdiction. The content is general in nature and may not pertain to specific circumstances, so it should not be used to act or refrain from acting based on it without first obtaining advice from professional counsel qualified in the applicable subject matter and jurisdictions.
Get monthly updates on the latest updates on policy & the shifting privacy landscape.
Dive into a world of knowledge, trends, and industry updates on the TrueVault blog.